NZIER numbers are grim for Taranaki householders but Energy Minister doubts they are the real oil

A report from the highly respected  NZ  Institute  of  Economic  Research  contended  the  Ardern government’s ban  on new offshore  oil and gas exploration will reduce the country’s GDP by between $15bn and $38bn, raise prices and shrink investment during the next 30 years.

The $28bn GDP loss incurred in NZIER’s mid-range scenario, if the industry kept operating and achieved only medium exploration success, is roughly equivalent in annual terms to the government’s capital expenditure on schools, or its annual spending on disability services. In Taranaki, real regional GDP falls by between 35% and 53% – or $16bn to $40bn – out to 2050.

A  powerful  argument, one would think,  to  re-consider the  ban?

No  sign of that   from the  government.   It is  sticking to  its  argument the ban, which also bars any onshore exploration other than in Taranaki, is necessary to set a long-term direction for the country’s climate change efforts.  Existing reserves and exploration permits are deemed sufficient to ensure security of gas supply for industry and power generation.

The  NZIER, in underlining  what it calls  large GDP impacts, says taking the net present value shows that, even in the low scenario, the GDP loss from the ban is equivalent to the current GDP value of New Zealand’s commercial fishing sector and larger than the forestry and logging sector.

While the ban’s impact will be felt most keenly in Taranaki, the impact on the national economy is “strongly negative”, the institute says. Employment in, and exports from, other regions improve, but those “few and incidental” benefits are “dwarfed” by the scale of the other losses.

Far  from  being  disconcerted    by the   NZIER’s analysis of the dire  impact of  the  exploration  ban,   Energy   Minister  Dr   Megan   Woods, answering questions in  Parliament  took the line  that the  report ignored the fact that the government is protecting 100,000 square kilometres of existing exploration area—an area the size of the North Island.

Nor does the report consider new jobs that may be created via the transition. A report concluded that in NZ, green energy could create more than 25,000 jobs. Secondly, this government has a comprehensive plan for transitioning to renewable energy—the growth area for jobs. Among other things we’re producing a renewables strategy that will remove roadblocks and accelerate them coming on stream, and we’ve already got people on the ground in Taranaki to work alongside locals on the transition plan for the coming decades”

Woods  says far  from the sky is falling in, she believes the medium-term outlook for gas is firming up.

“We’ve just seen the largest exploration firm in NZ invest a further $500m in Taranaki, we’ve seen Todd Energy investing $100m in a new gas peaker in Taranaki, and we’ve seen Methanex advertising for high-skill, high-wage jobs in the last couple of weeks. It’s also worth pointing out that Westpac’s climate change impact report, carried out by EY and Vivid Economics, released in April of last year, indicated that if NZ took faster action on climate change, it could save $30 billion by 2050. This government has a plan to transition away from fossil fuels over a number of decades and grow new jobs and new industries”

In that  answer   Woods   seemed to  be having a  bob  each way,  saying   green energy  could  create  25,000  jobs,  while pointing to  investment  in  exploiting  available  gas reserves.

As  for  Taranaki  bearing the brunt of  the   government’s ban on  further offshore exploration  Woods  says :

“There is actually a lot of positivity in Taranaki about the positivities. I point to the $20m this government has committed through the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) into that region, including a million dollars towards a green hydrogen feasibility study that will utilise the existing skills in that area. What we have seen is a series of community workshops, because we actually do think it is important to talk to those people that will be impacted by change as it comes. This Government knows that we need to plan beyond a fossil future. We have certainty that we can continue to use thermal peaking for the next couple of decades, but we are not burying our heads in the sand and leaving communities and this country high and dry”.

So  while  Woods  thinks  there  is  a  “lot of positivity in Taranaki  about the positivities”  the people  in that province   (which has been  one of the   most prosperous  in  NZ)  will have to  adjust, according  to the NZIER, under the medium scenario,  to  a fall   in real GDP per Taranaki household of $623,000 over the 30-year period – equivalent to a $20,774 fall in household incomes annually.

Some would  say that’s a  pretty  high price to pay for the  government  to “ set a long-term direction for the country’s climate change efforts”.


One thought on “NZIER numbers are grim for Taranaki householders but Energy Minister doubts they are the real oil

  1. The ban was a whim of Jacinda Ardern, seeking immortality for her “nuclear moment”. (Or maybe just a timely distraction from a Labour Party summer camp sex scandal?) It precluded any consideration of official advice or consultation with affected parties. It was highly undemocratic, like an edict by a dictator. Woods’ tautologous arguments are simply nonsensical back-fill. We are now importing coal to make up for gas shortages and we will be forced to import even more of our energy requirements in the future. Not only is the ban undemocratic it is also self-defeating in terms of its stated goal of combating climate change. And it will cost this country dearly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.