Robertson changes the debt target and extols the fiscal virtues of flexibility

Finance  Minister Grant Robertson  drew  diverse — and conflicting — responses to his announcement in a pre-budget speech  that he has moved  the Labour-led Coalition’s  debt  target  from 20%  of GDP  to  a  range  of  between 15%  and 25%,  in  the interests  (he  said) of greater   flexibility to  economic conditions.

From  the Left, the CTU  welcomed  the  move  but  said the government should  go  further and  faster in  relaxing  the  Budget  Responsibility Rules  because

“ … it is neither prudent nor responsible to privilege exceptionally low debt levels over major social, human, environmental and economic needs”.

From  the Right,  National’s  Amy  Adams  insisted Robertson had “thrown in the towel” on the rules  and is  loosening the purse strings by tens of billions of dollars.

When  in  Opposition,  Labour  was  being  accused of  having a  $11bn  hole in  their  proposed  budget, although Labour and the Green Party committed themselves   to  the  Budget Responsibility Rules and set a  target of  reducing  net  debt  to   20%  of  GDP within  5  years.

Though  still  reiterating  the government  holds  on  to that, Robertson  is now  signalling debt in several years could be allowed to climb significantly higher.  Another 5%  of  debt to GDP would mean, in today’s terms, borrowing roughly another $15bn.

Bill  Rosenberg,  of the CTU,  reckons even 25% debt is low by international standards, and  the bigger picture  shows there is no point in having exceptionally low levels of debt and government spending when Kiwis are living in poverty, health systems are failing in important ways, working people and businesses are crying out for better education and training, and our environment deteriorates.

The “fiscal responsibility” rules of the last 30 years have accompanied historically high levels of poverty, unemployment, inequality, a deteriorating environment and a low value economy.

The  CTU says  the Budget Responsibility Rules  are not fit for purpose in terms of New Zealanders’ wellbeing,

Robertson – of course –  doesn’t  concede he   is  bowing to  pressure  from  the unions (or  anyone else).  He  says the new range gives governments more capacity to respond to different circumstances.

“For example, a government may choose to move higher up the debt range to combat the impact of an economic recession, or where there are high value investments that will drive future economic dividends. At other times it may be prudent to reduce debt levels to the lower end of the range to provide headroom for future policy responses.

“NZ has low levels of government debt by international standards, but we remain vulnerable to shocks that are beyond our control, such as earthquakes and other natural disasters. We have made our commitment to keeping debt under control to ensure that future generations of New Zealanders are in a position to be able to respond effectively to any such shock..

Next Thursday’s budget will show the government will maintain government expenditure within the recent historical range of spending to GDP, which has averaged around 30% over the past 20 years.

The Crown accounts, for the first nine months of the June year, showed net debt was $60.51bn, or 20.6% of GDP.

Forecasts in Treasury’s half year fiscal and economic update in December showed net debt is forecast to be 20.9% in the year to June 30.  It then was projected to ease to 19% by the 2021/22 June year.

In Opposition Labour laid out a fiscal plan which would borrow around $11bn more than National had proposed, but still cut debt as a share of the total economic output from 24% to 20% by 2022.

That policy became a major point of contention during the election campaign, as National finance spokesman Steven Joyce was widely mocked for his claim that Robertson’s plan had a major “fiscal hole”.  Now  those economists, who monitor the likely issuance of government bonds, are warning of pressure for Treasury to borrow billions more than Labour had signalled because of new spending promises.

 

 

 

 

 

One thought on “Robertson changes the debt target and extols the fiscal virtues of flexibility

  1. The fiscal hole has developed – exactly as Joyce said it would. Those who mocked him should hold their heads in shame.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.