Westpac is forecasting 200,000 jobs will be lost in NZ as a result of the response to the coronavirus pandemic. Chief economist Dominick Stephens estimates economic activity during the four week lock-down would decline by a third, despite the government and the Reserve Bank having “done a lot to calm financial markets”.
Stephens said his feeling was that GDP in the three months to June would fall by more than 10%— “which is completely unprecedented in our lifetimes”.
The Westpac diagnosis reinforces the argument advanced by Point of Order in one of its most intently read posts: “After the lock-down the economy’s recovery will be dependent on dairy farmers and their milk”.
This post stressed that when the time comes for the government to start planning how the economy can recover, it should be working hard to ensure the dairy industry, along with other key pillars of the primary sector, gets every encouragement to increase production.
Many of those who read the post agreed that the volume of criticism dairy farmers had to absorb because of the methane emissions of their herds and the dirtying of rivers and streams reached absurd levels and affected industry morale.
Even early into the lock-down, ministers should be calling on their top advisers to find ways to trigger a rapid, and lasting, expansion of those key exports which have for so long been vital in sustaining the country’s standard of living. The hard truth is that, given the loss of tourist industry receipts, NZ will find it almost impossible to repay the debt now being incurred within a generation from the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, unless it can substantially increase overseas income from elsewhere in the export sector
Stuff reported Finance Minister Grant Robertson as saying that a nation-building-type programme would be a significant element of future policy, when it comes to economic recovery over both the medium, and long, term He has tasked Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and Transport Minister Phil Twyford with finding infrastructure projects that could be pulled forward to boost economic activity and employment.
The problem with that is NZ may have run out of borrowing capacity to fund those kind of projects—unless lenders have some confidence they are going to be repaid.
Stuff went on to report Robertson as being reluctant to expand on his thinking— but he did concede NZ will have to reassess fundamentally what is done on these shores. Infrastructure and housing programmes take time to plan and design before contracts can be let and workers employed.
Expansion of existing export industries will start yielding cash directly. And there is plenty of scope to do this if the right techniques are encouraged. Scaled-up hydroponics could vastly increase horticulture output.
Dairy production could also be boosted if the techniques of the smartest farmers were applied to those further down the chain and more irrigation schemes were built.
Then, too, the government could step back , for the time being, from its punitive proposals on freshwater regulation. For that matter, why doesn’t the government moderate its GM stand so that scientists can find through gene editing the best clovers and grasses, as well as the most productive animals, to ensure higher output from the land?
Why isn’t Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor in the vanguard promoting the elevation of agricultural industries to spearhead economic recovery? There’s little need to be concerned, as climate change warriors were, about methane emissions, because the collapse of the global tourist industry means carbon emissions from airlines, the worst polluters of all, have dropped so dramatically that most countries will now hit their Paris targets.
In the immediate stage, for the dairy industry, production may be tailing off because of drought in some of the country’s major dairying regions. Yet with the exchange rate moving in the favour of exporters the government should be active in urging farmers in other regions less affected by drought to extract the maximum output from the feed available.
As in wartime farmers will respond in what is the nation’s worst economic crisis, provided they believe there is real leadership coming from the top.
Can you start a column or a sticky page to talk about the business responses? There are many good businesses who have gone to zero revenue for at least four weeks with no reference points to estimate with any certainty what the immediate post cv-19 business environment is for their business. They are thinking I can’t take the wages subsidy for the employees of the business because I can’t guarantee jobs until 30 June and I can’t pay them without sales. Taking bigger loans from the bank to support an operation that is suspended (if actual bank support is available – and that’s a case all of its own) won’t make sense if there’s no obvious timeline to resumption of business and so on. Grant Robertson’s wage subsidy is a tiny piece of a large puzzle and it does little to solve the conundrum of stopping good businesses from ceasing. Many desperate businesses have grabbed the subsidy without understanding how they are going to carry on to at least June 30. They will pay it all to the employees as required. But on top the employer needs to pay the ACC and Kiwisaver levies, how? Suggesting businesses should pay 80% of normal wages is pie in the sky. Some key issues are: Most businesses pay employees more than $585 per week. Those employees need more than $585 to pay their own fixed costs. What gives?
Usual HR legislation hasn’t been suspended has it? How can an employer summarily reduce wages by 20%, or more, without consultation and agreement? None if this is addressed by the government. The aftermath will be in hindsight. When aggrieved employees later go to a tribunal saying they were not properly consulted and so it will go on. It’s a nightmare for people who a couple of weeks ago had good businesses employing lots of people and now have no certainty or decent data points to think of anything other than winding up operations as the only logical path.
The business support mechanism suggested by Michael Reddell needs urgent consideration.
LikeLike
Some good ideas which will sadly have to await a change of government. Now, let’s get back to our four weeks’ free trial of socialism shall we? Wonderful to hear Shane and Phil are onto it….so reassuring at this difficult time.
LikeLike
the dairy market in the USA has crumbled, prices are weak, there will be no dairy lead way out of this. Bank economists are B/S merchants. China’s economy is export orientated and that is going to mean big trouble for their economy.
‘Milk & Dairy Markets
Red ink flooded LaSalle Street this week. The dairy markets were decimated. Every Class III and Class IV contract on the board scored new life-of-contract lows. The selloff was steep and widespread, but second-quarter contracts suffered most. May Class III plummeted $1.44 to a painfully low $13.87 per cwt. May Class IV fared even worse, falling $1.79 to an unbearable $12.28. At today’s prices, dairy producers in a region with roughly half of their milk check derived from Class III and half from Class IV will earn just $13.08 per cwt., and $13.83 on their Class I share.’
LikeLike
You cannot be for real Grant. Tasking Shane and Phil, the self-appointed champion pork-barreller of the provinces and the kiwinotbuilder, with planning how to save our economic future – give me strength. As a recent letter to the DomPost Editor proposed, put the tried and tested experience of Key and English and suitable others like Michael Reddell in charge of the recovery plan now, but that won’t happen with this Govt so devoid of economic insight and talent. If they did that and had the ability to add the now unfortunate Michael Cullen as their balance the Govt would look and be wise – I’m not holding my breath.
LikeLike