Finance Minister Grant Robertson, who only four months ago would have been quietly rejoicing at the prospect of presenting an election-winning budget, now has the challenge of framing a programme to salvage the economy. It will be a formidable task, even if at the time of presentation the country is in sight of freeing itself from the blight of Covid-19.
He says he has a strong personal belief in the power of the state to do good. And certainly the Ardern coalition has deployed the power of the state effectively in the campaign against the Covid-19 pandemic.
If Robertson can do the same with the economy, he will win a place in history. But with economists predicting unemployment will soar above 10% of the workforce, and consequently inequality set to deepen, many New Zealanders could be disadvantaged for life.
Already Robertson is getting plenty of advice on what his priorities should be. Labour’s coalition supporter, the Green Party, is calling is calling for an “ economic stimulus package fit for the 21st century that puts people, climate, and nature first with significant investment in nature based jobs”.
It proposes a $1bn package over three years to support local communities, iwi, businesses, NGOs, councils and DOC to employ thousands of people across NZ to restore and look after our natural landscapes, native bush, birds, waterways and coast.
Whether Robertson will be excited by that idea remains to be seen. Point of Order is not aware of what Labour’s other ally, NZ First, is proposing, but suspects Shane Jones will be outbidding the Greens with a package costing a good deal more than the $3bn he got in his Provincial Growth Fund.
Independent economic commentator Michael Reddell is concerned the government has no clear and credible economic strategy for any of the stages ahead now facing the country. He worries that the prospects are for lingering high unemployment, further reductions in trade/GDP (the environment having got tougher and the relative prices not changed in NZ’s favour) and no credible chance of any improvement in productivity performance.
Robertson himself has conceded that New Zealanders – through this virus have seen what happens when sectors and industries are overly reliant on certain markets for their export revenue. He has said while NZ must always remain a trading nation, it will need to look at greater diversification of export markets to make sure it is prepared for any future shocks to trade networks.
Just how NZ will compensate for the loss of foreign exchange it has earned from tourism and the education of international students is unstated. Nor do Opposition politicians offer options.
But that loss – probably of more than $40bn a year – underlines the vital need to place top priority on sustaining, and expanding, the earnings in NZ dollar terms from NZ’s primary and manufacturing industries, the biggest of which is the dairy industry .
NZ’s largest company, Fonterra, will return more than $11bn to its farmer suppliers this year. But with the deterioration in world markets, Rabobank (for example) is forecasting the farmgate milk price for the 2020-21 season will fall to $5.60/kgMS.
This is well below the range of $7 to $7.60 for the current season, and below what would be the break-even point for many dairy farmers. Without the financial incentive of a better price farmers might concentrate on trimming costs, rather than expanding production.
Clearly NZ needs a more favourable exchange as it navigates this economic crisis.
But even though a couple of NZ’s major export sectors are closed off, the exchange rate has not depreciated to the extent that might have been expected.
Michael Reddell spells out the hard truth:
“If the government is serious about doing better on the trade front you’d have hoped that a sustained lower real exchange rate would be a material part of the mix. For that, a much looser monetary policy is a key upfront part of the initial mix.”
As for the dairy industry, without that sustained lower exchange rate the priority for individual operators might be to reduce debt as fast as possible rather than increase production and potential foreign exchange earnings.
Rabobank based its forecast payout for the 2020-21 season on an exchange rate of the NZ dollar at 57USc (down from the current 59 to 60USc range). Realistically, it needs to be around 10% lower.
Reddell finds it “alarming” that the government has not focussed on the tool that usually plays the large part in cyclical stabilisation, getting short-term growth rates up to reabsorb unused labour and capital: monetary policy.
“The (in effect) complacency about the lack of any material fall in real interest rates in response to this dramatic economic slump is quite remarkable – and really rather alarming”.
Not everyone will be convinced — as Robertson claims — the government has been able to coordinate and provide leadership for New Zealanders, guiding both the public health response and the economic response to this crisis, because NZ has a well-funded, highly functional public service.
The scepticism might become more widespread if the Ardern government fails to get to grips with the underlying pressures within the economy, misses the real targets with its policy signals, and does not ensure the incentives for the private sector to absorb excess capacity.
ly functional public service.
The scepticism might become more widespread if the Ardern government fails to get to grips with the underlying pressures within the economy, misses the real targets with its policy signals, and does not ensure the incentives for the private sector to absorb excess capacity.
I would say that based on the billion trees, the 100,000 houses, trains to the airport, light rail in Auckland, and the disingenuous (outright lies) that have been brought up day after day during the lock-down, this coalition of losers doesn’t have a snowballs chance.
LikeLike
Why should farmers expand production when they are penalized under “environmental” regulations for doing so? The IMF predicts our GDP will fall by over 7% in the year ahead, the worst drop outside Europe and Venezuela. Food production is our remaining strength and must be given priority – the government should remove barriers to research such as the ridiculous ban on gene editing and generally get out of the way. We also need to start bringing our manufacturing home from China – here the government could play a useful role with tax incentives. Private investment is the key to rehabilitation of the economy, not more government committees and working groups.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely on the money. The government went with dodgy science as evidence to support the lock-down but chooses to ignore proven science in support of gene editing. And I for one have moved my production to China simply because of all of the compliance costs imposed on us here. Instead of handing out $billions, why not remove the red tape and incentivise us to bring the jobs home?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Inquiring Mind and commented:
Some pertinent comment
LikeLike