Look to the White House for the reason why there has been no global accord to tackle the pandemic

One of the puzzling aspects of the global Coronavirus pandemic has been the absence of an international accord to grapple with the greatest challenge since the Second World War.

After the global financial crisis of 2008-9, world leaders agreed to devise solutions – US presidents George W Bush, Barack  Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy brought the world’s major economies together to work on a global solution using the strength of the G20.

This time, there has been little concerted action. The United Nations Security Council is once more toothless, strangled by the veto powers of the five permanent members -Britain, China, France, Russia and the US.

The G20 has been quiescent and even the G7 has been missing in action, other than a series of telephone calls by the current chairman, President Donald Trump.

The World Health Organisation has performed a clearing-house role, uttered brave statements and initiated a review into how the Coronavirus pandemic was handled – but has not demonstrated the sort of drive and energy displayed during the Ebola crisis.

Trump is the missing link.

Back in 2008, Bush and Obama recognised the US had to lead the world using all of its power and resources to prevent a great recession from becoming a great Depression.  Since taking office in January 2017, Trump has denigrated the world’s leading multilateral forums, other than chatting amiably with Russia’s President Putin, China’s Xi Jinping and North Korea’s Kim Un Jong.

Writing in Foreign Affairs, former US diplomat and undersecretary of state Nicholas Burns says the US – throughout its history – has been fortunate to have visionary, charismatic leadership at times of great crisis.  Among them: George Washington during the Revolution, Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression and World War II.

Trump, unfortunately, has not proved himself to be anywhere close to such a leader.  His character drives him to divide rather than to unite at home.

“His ‘America first’ foreign policy instincts drive him to act alone in the world rather than in concert with others. He seems incapable of imagining that the United States might be made stronger and more effective by confronting a crisis in lockstep with its allies and partners.

“He has initiated no significant international action. And he has dramatically weakened many of the federal agencies that would normally lead the global response to such a crisis: the State Department, the US Agency for International Development, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense which he very unwisely disbanded in 2018.

“Is it any wonder that the institutions of government he routinely derides, and has starved for funds and leadership, would prove so catastrophically unprepared?”

Burns suggests Trump still has time. He should call together a G-20 leaders’ steering group to focus on the health and economic challenges ahead. Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, to start, should begin meetings via teleconference to discuss how to blunt both the health and economic impacts.

This leadership group should meet weekly if necessary, to assess progress and resolve the inevitable disputes and misunderstandings of such a massive global undertaking.

They should appoint and empower trusted senior cabinet-level officials to meet daily to identify the roadblocks in the international response; to resolve practical problems impeding relief efforts; and to partner on long-term plans that can ultimately bring the crisis to an end.

Any other recent American president would have confronted the crisis much more urgently from the start.

The priority would have been at home, of course. But both Obama and Bush, like many presidents before them, would have also understood the need for an all-out global effort, led by the United States and its allies, to confront the threat together. It is not too late, Burns says.

All very well, but over the last month the Administration in Washington DC has fired broadside after broadside at China, from the head of the FBI to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo from human rights, to Hong Kong, espionage and intellectual theft (with a couple of convenient court cases). Trump himself has categorised the Covid-19 virus variously as “kung flu” or “Wuhan Flu” – none of which endears him to Beijing.

4 thoughts on “Look to the White House for the reason why there has been no global accord to tackle the pandemic

  1. Didnt take long to “”position”” Nicholas Burns!!!
    Reading some of his twits etc
    He is a rapid anti Trumper.
    Surprise.

    So everything wrong in the world is placed at the feet of Trump.
    Glossed over in this article is the ineptitude of the WHO which is the “”worlds”” centre of excellence(sic) and clearing house for all things public health

    “”The World Health Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. The WHO Constitution, which establishes the agency’s governing structure and principles, states its main objective as “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.””

    NZ followed the WHO advice (to its detriment in my view, regarding use of masks) as the Centre of Excellence when it could have done a better job. Remember it was WHO that said no need to restrict international travel and that the Virus does not get spread human to human!!!

    Google, Facebook etc are cancelling anything that goes against the WHO advice.
    So they think its important.

    I usually enjoy the thortful posts of this site.
    Unfortunately this is not one of them

    Keep up the good work tho.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “China lied, people died”. And it’s all Trump’s fault!? The WHO under its present leadership is a stooge of China, the inquiry will be a whitewash. Will Clark and her colleague be granted access to the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s records? Yeah right! How can the G20 act when there is deservedly a complete lack of trust in China? And what would the UN do, pass another resolution? The solution lies in international cooperation towards a vaccine, which appears to be happening.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.