Two of the Labour government’s major policies are to reduce carbon emissions in the battle against climate change, and to produce 100% of NZ’s energy from renewable sources.
So are those policies going?
Reports this week make it clear: poorly.
So badly, indeed, that Energy Minister Megan Woods could be living in la-la land.
This was her response to RNZ’s finding that in the same year the government declared a climate emergency, imports of an especially dirty type of coal from Indonesia topped a million tonnes for the first time since 2006:
“This government is not been [sic] satisfied with this reliance on fossil fuels and last year we backed up our goal to have a fully renewable electricity grid with a $30m investigation into solving the dry year problem.
“The NZ Battery project is investigating the country’s potential for pumped hydro, as well as comparator technologies, and is progressing well but will take time.”
Coal is currently generating a significant proportion of NZ’s electricity. In the first quarter of this year, 44% of Genesis Energy’s total generation was from coal.
The company has signed an agreement to receive natural gas from another company, Methanex.
Woods said there has been an unexpected reduction in natural gas supply from the Pohokura gas field, recently the country’s largest.
“At full capacity, Pohokura gas field provides about 40% of NZ’s natural gas supply but over the past 12 months, production from the field has almost halved.
“As a result, overall natural gas production is down about 20% on last year. While this decline has put pressure on the supply of gas for all users, including electricity generators, this is not something anyone could have foreseen and is not a result of government decisions.
“The market responded as it was originally designed to, which included more use of coal at Huntly power station to provide the dry year cover that gas has previously provided to ensure security of supply.”
Woods said the energy sector has also committed over $1bn in new renewable capacity this year alone, including both geothermal and wind energy plants. Another wind farm, Waipipi, opened last month, and the country’s biggest solar farm in Kapuni.
But much of that capacity won’t be available for several years.
And guess what?
Wholesale electricity prices have climbed so high, the cost has been a factor in key industries limiting production.
But the government doesn’t seem unduly grieved about that. It is the majority shareholder of each of Genesis, Mercury and Meridian energy companies.
The issues at the Pohokura field could not have been foreseen but certainly the decision announced with much flag-waving in 2018 by the Ardern government not to offer new offshore permits for gas exploration compounded the problem. It drove away companies from offshore exploration and even those with fields to develop.
NZ had 2021 petajoules (PJ) or about 2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas sitting in existing gas fields at the start of last year that could be economically extracted.
That means NZ may now only have about nine years supply left, at current consumption rates, which would take us through to 2030.
Gas prices have risen this year because of an unexpectedly fast decline in production from the country’s existing fields.
That is one reason why Genesis Energy has been burning vast amounts of Indonesia coal at its Huntly power station to produce electricity. Another, arguably, is a failure by the power industry to invest soon enough in additional renewables, but the issue there is whether the investment is economic.
According to reports, Woods appears concerned that shutting off new connections to the gas network from 2025 could undermine infrastructure the country may want later to distribute greener fuels.
So how short-term is this problem?
The Gas Industry Company, an industry body reporting to the Energy Minister forecasts tight supply will last at least until the middle of next year and perhaps into 2023 and 2024.
There may be faster supply after that, but then question would be, for how long?
The challenge of matching demand and supply in a declining but capital-intensive industry where ocean rigs have to be brought in from overseas is, by its nature, only likely to get harder.
So the current short-term production problem could prove to be one of a number of short-term problems that together look much more like a major medium-term problem.
The difficulty arises – when cutting back on gas – in gauging whether and when producers will have with enough confidence to invest to ensure continuing supply.
If Methanex permanently closed one or both of its two larger methanol plants, a large amount of supply (the company said in 2019 it accounted for 45 per cent of gas demand) would be freed.
But the Gas Industry Company has warned that could that kill investment in production, reduce security of supply, and lead to something of a domino effect.
One of those dominos, which the industry body describes as “the worst case scenario”, might mean gas not being available for Genesis to burn at Huntly to see the electricity market through any dry years from 2026.
It said Methanex was the only buyer large enough to underpin production investment over a long enough timeframe to make investment in production economically viable.
Point of Order sees Woods as one of the more effective ministers in the Ardern government, but suspects the issues she confronts in the energy sector are so complex she will continue to struggle to resolve them.
Despite the winter energy payment the government introduced, consumers will have to brace themselves for rising electricity prices, like other prices in the energy sector.
3 thoughts on “Over $1bn is invested in renewable energy but meanwhile NZ must import coal to generate electricity”
The gas exploration ban was a wanton act of economic sabotage by a chronic narcissist which we will all now have to pay for.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The lowest emitting (like nil), long life and guaranteed base load is nuclear power. Any self respecting climate change advocate would be going hard to adopt safe (and that’s not an oxymoron) nuclear power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why is New Zealand following the nonsense of “man-made climate change”. Nothing that has happened to the climate in the two hundred and fifty years since the start of the industrial revolution has not also happened before that period of time. Man-made climate change is the biggest and most costly con that has ever happened.
The earth’s atmosphere is made up of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon, with the balance of 0.1% being trace gases including carbon dioxide, methane, water vapour, and neon.
Carbon dioxide is one of the four trace gases making up just a miniscule 0.1% of the atmosphere. And 97% of that carbon dioxide emanates naturally from within the earth, so mankind can only tinker with 3% of the carbon dioxide. If the 0.1% of trace gases is divided equally between the main four then carbon dioxide represents 0.025% of the atmosphere and mankind can tinker with just 3.0% of that 0.025%. So mankind’s influence can affect only 0.00075% of the earth’s atmosphere. This is bugger all. And even if you quadruple it to take the full 0.1% of trace gasses, it is still bugger all.
Anyone who thinks mankind is responsible for “climate change” is a complete and utter fool or is using this falsehood to implement personal agendas, as per Al Gore et al. Cheap “green” energy is a myth; it is far more expensive than present energy sources. But it will make a few people (the “elite”) super-rich at the expense of the rest of the population.
For the sake of mankind and the world’s economies, NZ must stop this nonsense once and for all. Closing coal mines, preventing oil exploration, culling agricultural stock numbers etc will bankrupt the world in general and New Zealand in particular.