Two key economic issues that should be tackled in Budget 2022 – but don’t hold your breath, folk

Two  of  New Zealand’s principal economic    issues   are  its  low  productivity and  high effective   corporate  tax  rates.

So will the  Ardern  government  tackle  these   issues   in  Budget  2022?

Finance  Minister  Grant  Robertson  could   write  himself   into   NZ’s  economic  history  if  he  did  so.

Sadly,  Point of  Order  suspects  he  might  go  for  what are  quick-fixes  (if he  does  anything at all)  that  do  little  to  raise  investment levels  and  lift  productivity  to stop NZ  falling   further  behind other  advanced  economies..

The  OECD in  its annual  review   of the  NZ  economy attributed  the low productivity rate  to muted product market competition, weak international linkages and innovation, and skills and qualifications mismatches.  

Along  with that, the  OECD  said:

“Effective corporate tax rates are high by international comparison, holding back capital investment and FDI”.

It went  on:

“New Zealand has considerable scope to boost productivity by fostering growth of its digital sector and stimulating digital innovation. This requires strengthening the domestic pipeline of digital skills, making sure that regulations evolve with technological change and enhancing exports by firms exploiting digital technologies.

“New Zealand is relatively advanced in some aspects of digitalisation, such as the high share of small firms selling online or use of the Internet of Things. However, the digital sector is smaller than in other OECD countries and has relied heavily on skilled migrants to fill jobs requiring advanced digital skills.

“It is now facing a severe skills shortage caused by border restrictions in the short term and competition from other countries in the longer term. The domestic pipeline of graduates with advanced ICT skills is narrowing, as weak mathematics and science achievement by students in primary- and lower secondary schools closes the door to tertiary studies in ICT-relevant fields. The diffusion of digital technologies is also held back by a copyright regime that does not accommodate the use of some digital technologies, the cost of adopting digital tools for small businesses and the difficulty of reaping high returns on investment in digital technologies by exporting.

“ The government has been developing several policy initiatives on digitalisation, including the Industry Transformation Plans to foster the development of digital technology and agritech sectors. It recently embarked on the production of a national digitalisation strategy, which aims to promote trust, inclusiveness and growth in the digital economy and society. This strategy would help stakeholders in a wide range of policy areas to work together in a coherent way.”

The  OECD  also  says the introduction of unemployment insurance would help to make the diffusion of digital technologies more equitable by reducing the burden on workers displaced by digitalisation – most displaced workers do not qualify for the means-tested unemployment benefit.

The  OECD,  noting that corporate income tax rates are higher in New Zealand than in most other member countries, said  they are especially high compared with some small advanced economies.

“The high nominal rate  encourages internationalised firms to shift profits abroad or locate their highly profitable activities outside New Zealand. The high marginal effective rate  discourages firms, including multinationals, from investing more by increasing the user cost of capital, contributing to low rates of capital investment in New Zealand. The difference between nominal and effective tax rates is smaller in New Zealand than in most other OECD countries because the corporate income tax base is broader, despite the reinstatement of depreciation deductions on industrial and commercial buildings in 2020.

“Reducing the nominal corporate tax rate to align the effective rate with those in Australia and small advanced economies would encourage investment in tangible and intangible capital that contributes to productivity growth. It would also reduce incentives for internationalised firms to minimise the share of profits declared in New Zealand. However, these benefits need to be weighed against fiscal and other costs of reducing the corporate tax rate. For instance, lowering the corporate tax rate (28%) further below the top two marginal personal income tax rates (38% and 33%) could endanger tax integrity by encouraging wealthy individuals to shift income to corporate entities to reduce their tax liabilities. It would also reduce taxation of economic rents.’’

Like  other  sage  advice from the  OECD,   Point of  Order thinks  it  has  fallen   on  deaf  ears  in the   Beehive.

If  it  hasn’t  and  the  Budget   contains  some   actions   at  least  to  raise  productivity,  we  will be pleasantly surprised and have one less issue to beef about when we are judging the  Ardern government’s performance.  At least for now…

One thought on “Two key economic issues that should be tackled in Budget 2022 – but don’t hold your breath, folk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.