“AUKUS logic is morally repugnant, and NZ must resist it” ran the headline over a leader- page feature in the Dominion-Post recently.
In the article beneath that advice, Thomas Nash, co-director of the independent think-tank, New Zealand Alternative, argued the AUKUS alliance between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States has triggered a dangerous line in commentary questioning this country’s nuclear-free status.
Nash says many of the opinion writers appear to prioritise a militarist worldview but he contends if we are to enjoy a peaceful future, we should do the exact opposite “and forge closer relations that share our anti-nuclear values”.
NZ should resist pressure to fall into line with the military power of the US, the UK and Australia.
Instead of focusing our diplomatic and security efforts on the Five Eyes, he argues, we should strengthen our relationships in Asean countries, Latin America, and in our neighbouring nuclear-free Pacific Islands. Continue reading “AUKUS – it’s all very well expressing our moral repugnance but that won’t halt China’s bullying”
It has taken nearly nine months but finally the government has spelled out its foreign policy, much to the relief of neighbours, allies and friends. Speeches by both Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta and now Prime Minister Ardern have been followed closely in many capitals.
It’s no coincidence that President Joe Biden called PM Ardern this week.
Ostensibly, the call preceded the PM’s Zoom meeting with APEC leaders. The real reason seems to be that – at last – Washington DC has heard the policy, in person, from NZ ministers.
According to Washington and Wellington the call went well and was cordial. Continue reading “PM’s foreign affairs speech – fortifying what Mahuta said – resonates strongly with the Biden Administration”
Andrea Vance, writing at Stuff, has taken the Ardern government to task for its media “management,” how ministers evade questions, how they deflect interviews and questions all, of course, in the name of the PM’s much-vaunted transparency.
Well, it seems she has stumbled on to something bigger than her focus on journalists struggling to get information. From our inquiries we have found that heads of departments, ministries and agencies are facing something of the same challenge.
Firstly, ministers are said to be keeping permanent heads at a distance. Some find it hard to secure scheduled appointments.
In the good old days, the permanent head of each department saw his or her minister before Monday Cabinet meetings – and frequently in between.
Now there is a layer of “advisers” between them. Continue reading “State service heads face much the same challenge as journalists – getting through to Ardern’s Ministers is a struggle”
Question of the Week: Will New Zealand be expelled from Five Eyes, following Nanaia Mahuta’s speech on foreign policy?
NZ Herald’s political editor Audrey Young, in a report on Thursday, wrote:
“NZ faces the prospect of expulsion from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, according to Con Coughlin, defence editor for the Daily Telegraph in the UK.
Coughlin said attempts by the other Five Eyes countries (Britain, the US, Canada and Australia) to present a united front against China have been thwarted by the NZ government’s preference for maintaining cordial ties with Beijing.
He referred to Jacinda Ardern as “NZ’s tiresomely woke Prime Minister”, saying she has a preference for “cosying up to China’s communist rulers”.
“Thanks to Wellington’s naïve decision to prioritise trade with China over its membership of the elite Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, Ardern can expect her country’s isolation to deepen even further as NZ faces the very real prospect of expulsion over its pro-Beijing stance”. Continue reading “Dragons-and-taniwha speech raises questions about NZ’s future in Five Eyes – and about the extent of Cabinet’s endorsement”
With consummate timing, Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta has stirred up another controversy days ahead of the first visit of her Australian counterpart, Marise Payne. New Zealand, she says, doesn’t want to use Five Eyes as the first point of contact on a range of issues that existed outside of its remit.
The NZ Herald quoted her as explaining:
“That is a matter that we have raised with Five Eyes partners that we are uncomfortable with expanding the remit of Five Eyes.”
Our Five Eyes partners, Australia, the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, are bound to be disappointed, if not dismayed.
They may well wonder if our government is away with the fairies. The title of Mahuta’s speech was “He Taniwha He Tipua, He Tipua He Taniwha – The Dragon and the Taniwha”.
We were fascinated by that title.
In 2009, academic writer Manying Ip published a 360-page book exploring how two very different marginalised groups in New Zealand society – Maori and Chinese – had interacted over the past 150 years.
She called it – would you believe? – The Dragon and the Taniwha. Continue reading “Away with the fairies? A poke in the eye for four NZ allies (and a likely review of the White House guest list) as China policy is refined”
Intelligence officials are discounting Helen Clark’s pronouncement that NZ has lost its “independence” through its participation in the Five Eyes intelligence arrangement that links NZ with Australia, Canada, the UK and the US. Her enthusiasm as prime minister for the flood of intelligence is well remembered by the intelligence community.
Rather, they say, in an increasingly troubled world, the arrangement is extending the flow of information and provides Wellington with a stronger voice. It has become a useful tool for promoting shared values and it remains an international forum in which NZ can play a significant role in shaping policy
Earlier this month, as China announced its final assumption of power in Hong Kong, the group issued a rebuke as Washington, London, Ottawa and Canberra criticised China for undermining the “one country, two systems” framework that was meant to determine Hong Kong’s future for 50 years after its handover from British rule in 1997. Continue reading “Five Eyes – it gives NZ a stronger voice as well as providing insights for shaping policy”
New Zealand may have been presented with a model to follow in dealing with the Chinese giant technology firm Huawei. According to London’s “The Economist” Britain has struck an artful compromise on Huawei and 5G, even though many Americans and other friends of Britain will be appalled by its decision and fear the country is being naive and toadying up to China..
But, in an editorial, The Economist reckons the UK’s measured approach to dealing with the controversial Chinese firm is a model for other countries.
“Britain’s decision matters: it is a member of the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence-sharing alliance led by America, and was one of the first Western economies in which Huawei built a presence. Britain also has experience of electronic spying and knows Huawei well.
“Far from being a betrayal, Britain’s approach, of using the firm’s gear on the edges of 5G networks, under close supervision, offers a sensible framework for limited commercial engagement while protecting Britain’s security and that of its allies.” Continue reading “Spark will be cheered by endorsement of UK’s handling of the Huawei spying threat”